[Solution]Ethics, John Mackie & John McDowell

Short Essay Question John Mackie influentially argued that objective values are just too “queer” to exist. On the other hand, John McDowell criticized Mackie’s position…

Short Essay Question John Mackie influentially argued that objective values are just too “queer” to exist. On the other hand, John McDowell criticized Mackie’s position because, as he argued, values are like secondary qualities and, hence, objective. In this short essay, present Mackie’s argument against the objectivity of values (focus on the argument from queerness) and McDowell’s objection (focus on his conception of objectivity and secondary qualities, and explanation). Evaluate the arguments and present your reasons to determine which argument is the strongest. Max. 6 pages Min. 5 Pages Times New Roman, size 12 1″ margins Double Spaced No Title Page No introduction, no conclusion. straight to the point. 1.5-2 pages on John Mackie′s argument 1.5-2 pages on John McDowell argument 1.5-2 pages on my opinion on reasons for why both arguments are strong or week & which position I think is stronger. Also to evaluate both, what are their strong and week points and how they could be improved. I have attached a picture of some arguments from queerness. Also to fully understand the subjectivity of values of John Mackie, you can read them from the online book version on page 22-30. ( https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=P-1CpL6XDTYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=ethical+theory+an+anthology+second+edition&ots=2ajQveeHF0&sig=rm07AEdr7egNex7Wj3gufrjKHow#v=onepage&q=ethical%20theory%20an%20anthology%20second%20edition&f=false )

The post Ethics, John Mackie & John McDowell

Assignment status: Solved by our experts

>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *