[Recommended]Assignment 3: Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law-Get Fast and Reliable Assignment Help

Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. Assignment…

Students, please view
the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.
Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.

Assignment 3: Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law
Due Week 8 and worth 200
points

Law enforcement in
America has seen drastic changes over the past one hundred years, from the
educational requirements of officers to the interpretation of the Bill of
Rights. Law enforcement officers today are expected to perform their duties at
a very high level of professionalism and morality. Unfortunately, when officers
don’t perform at this high level, it is their commanders who ultimately may be
held responsible for their actions. Use your textbook, the Internet, and/or
Strayer Library (https://research.strayer.edu) to research credible sources on
the aforementioned issues as they relate to law enforcement operations and
management.

Write a 5- to 7-page
paper in which you explore the constraints on the police in democratic
societies and assess the management and leadership challenges. Cite real-world
examples to strengthen your discussion and illustrate your points. Address
following in your paper:

Examine the change in
requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates over
the last 50 years and discuss the effects on law enforcement organizations.
Support or critique the current requirements.Examine two areas in
which federal courts have placed limits on officer’s constitutional rights due
to the nature of their work and explain the reasoning.Identify three
constraints placed on law enforcement and examine how these constraints affect
how law enforcement conducts their operations.Examine two current
events in which police supervisors were held criminally liable for their officers’
misconduct and explain the reasons why.Use at least four
quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as
academic resources.

Your assignment must
follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font
(size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references
should follow the Strayer Writing
Standards (SWS).
This format is different than other Strayer University Courses. Please
take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details. Check with your
professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the
assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title,
and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in
the required assignment page length.

The specific course
learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Illustrate the constraints on the police in democratic
societies to include personal issues and practices, the rule of law,
general principles of accountability, ethics, and civil liability.Assess management and leadership challenges in police
organizations and recommend solutions that foster an ethical work
environment.Use technology and information resources to research
issues in law enforcement operations and management.Write clearly and concisely about law enforcement
operations and management using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.

Grading
for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of
the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 200

Assignment 3: Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of
Law

Criteria

Unacceptable
Below
60% F

Meets
Minimum Expectations
60-69%
D

Fair
70-79%
C

Proficient
80-89%
B

Exemplary
90-100%
A

1. Examine the change in
requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates
over the last 50 years and discuss the effects on law enforcement
organizations. Support or critique the current requirements.
Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely
examined the requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential
candidates. Did not submit or incompletely supported or critiqued the
requirements.

Insufficiently examined the
requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates.
Insufficiently supported or critiqued the requirements.

Partially examined the
requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates.
Partially supported or critiqued the requirements.

Satisfactorily examined the
requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates.
Satisfactorily supported or critiqued the requirements.

Thoroughly examined the
requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates.
Thoroughly supported or critiqued the requirements.

2. Examine two areas in which
federal courts have placed limits on officers’ constitutional rights due to
the nature of their work and explain the reasoning.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely
examined two areas in which federal courts have placed limits on officers’
constitutional rights due to the nature of their work. Did not submit or
incompletely explained the reasoning.

Insufficiently examined two areas
in which federal courts have placed limits on officers’ constitutional rights
due to the nature of their work. Insufficiently examined the reasoning.

Partially examined two areas in
which federal courts have placed limits on officers’ constitutional rights
due to the nature of their work. Partially examined the reasoning.

Satisfactorily examined two areas
in which federal courts have placed limits on officers’ constitutional rights
due to the nature of their work. Satisfactorily explained the reasoning.

Thoroughly examined two areas in
which federal courts have placed limits on officers’ constitutional rights
due to the nature of their work. Thoroughly explained the reasoning

3. Identify three constraints
placed on law enforcement and examine how these constraints affect how law
enforcement conducts their operations.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely
identified three constraints placed on law enforcement and examined how these
constraints affect how law enforcement conducts their operations.

Insufficiently identified three
constraints placed on law enforcement and examined how these constraints
affect how law enforcement conducts their operations.

Partially identified three
constraints placed on law enforcement and examined how these constraints
affect how law enforcement conducts their operations.

Satisfactorily identified three
constraints placed on law enforcement and examined how these constraints
affect how law enforcement conducts their operations.

Thoroughly identified three
constraints placed on law enforcement and examined how these constraints
affect how law enforcement conducts their operations.

4. Examine two current events in
which police supervisors were held criminally liable for their officers’
misconduct and explain the reasons why.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely
examined two current events in which police supervisors were held criminally
liable for their officers’ misconduct. Did not submit or incompletely
explained the reasons why.

Insufficiently examined two
current events in which police supervisors were held criminally liable for
their officers’ misconduct. Insufficiently explained the reasons why.

Partially examined two current
events in which police supervisors were held criminally liable for their
officers’ misconduct. Partially explained the reasons why.

Satisfactorily examined two
current events in which police supervisors were held criminally liable for
their officers’ misconduct. Satisfactorily explained the reasons why.

Thoroughly examined two current
events in which police supervisors were held criminally liable for their
officers’ misconduct. Thoroughly explained the reasons why.

5. Cite 4 references.
Weight: 5%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number
of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number
of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required
references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required
references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and
formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present.

7-8 errors present.

5-6 errors present.

3-4 errors present.

0-2 errors present.

The post Assignment 3: Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law-Get Fast and Reliable Assignment Help .
Assignment status: Solved by our experts

>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *