[Recommended]Briefly take into account the data analyzed and needs identified in PS6150 and state your proposed intervention ideas

1. Assignment: One Pager – Intervention Ideas Based on the assigned reading and the activities throughout the module, you will identify, explore and articulate intervention…

1.
Assignment: One Pager – Intervention Ideas

Based on the assigned reading and the
activities throughout the module, you will identify, explore and articulate
intervention ideas to be applied to your own capstone projects.

Details

Briefly take into account the data analyzed,
and needs identified in PS6150, and state your
proposed intervention ideas. Remember these will evolve as we progress
through the course but use this opportunity to present your first set of
ideas. 

Submit File as:
firstname_lastname_onepager_date

Submission

To complete your submission,

Click
the blue Submit Assignment button at the top of this page.Click
the Choose File button, and locate your submission.Finally,
click the blue Submit Assignment button.

Rubric

Rubric for Written Assignments (10 Pts)

Rubric
for Written Assignments (10 Pts)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeDepth of analysis

3.5 to >3.15 pts
Sophisticated
Paper goes beyond the assignment
to explore the implications of arguments or evidence in new contexts or in
particularly thoughtful, insightful, and/or original ways. Paper shows a
nuanced grasp of conflict resolution principles and the ability to apply
these principles with facility.

3.15 to >2.8 pts
Highly Competent
Paper fully meets the parameters
of the assignment but does not exceed them. (and/or…) Paper demonstrates a
good grasp of conflict resolution principles but some awkwardness applying
them.

2.8 to >2.45 pts
Fairly Competent
Paper does not address some
aspects of the assignment. (and/or…) Paper demonstrates a somewhat shaky
grasp of conflict resolution principles.

2.45 to >0 pts
Not yet competent
Paper does not address the
assignment. Paper is inconsistent with conflict resolution principles
(i.e., it makes or fails to challenge the systemic assumptions of the
problem.)

3.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeGrasp of reading(s)

1.0 to >0.9 pts
Sophisticated
Paper represents the authors’
arguments, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly and eloquently.
Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of the author’s
arguments.

0.9 to >0.8 pts
Highly Competent
Paper represents the author’s
arguments, evidence and conclusions accurately.

0.8 to >0.7 pts
Fairly Competent
Paper represents the authors’
arguments, evidence and conclusions accurately though not sufficiently
clearly. (and/or…) There are minor inaccuracies.

0.7 to >0 pts
Not Yet Competent
Paper misrepresents the authors’
arguments, evidence, and/or conclusions. There is a lack of discipline of
thought.

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeArgument& Evidence

3.0 to >2.7 pts
Sophisticated
Evidence used to support the
central point is rich, detailed and well chosen. Evidence sections employ
appropriate illustrations and/or quotations. The connection between
argument and evidence is clearly and compellingly articulated in all cases.
Guides the reader smoothly and logically into the body of the paper
convincingly refuted.

2.7 to >2.4 pts
Highly Competent
Evidence used to support the
central point is well chosen, though not particularly rich or detailed. The
connection between argument and evidence is clearly articulated. Thesis
paragraph clearly identifies a demonstrable central argument.

2.4 to >2.1 pts
Fairly Competent
Connection between argument and
evidence is not clearly articulated in all cases. (and/or…) (Where
applicable) Consideration of opposing evidence is cursory or the evidence
is not convincingly refuted. Paper paragraph identifies a central argument
that is demonstrable, though not stated sufficiently clearly.

2.1 to >0 pts
Not yet competent
Evidence used does not clearly
support the main argument. (and/or…) (Where applicable) Important opposing
evidence is ignored, thereby weakening the central argument.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeLogic& Organization

2.5 pts
Sophisticated
Organization of paper as a whole
is logical and quickly apparent. Connections among paragraphs are clearly
articulated. Transitions between paragraphs are smooth. Every paragraph
makes one distinct and coherent point, expressed in a clear topic sentence;
the parts of each paragraph connect logically and persuasively, and
internal transitions are smooth.

2.25 pts
Highly Competent
Organization of paper as a whole
is logical and apparent, but transitions between paragraphs are not
consistently smooth. Every paragraph makes one distinct and coherent point
and, for the most part, the parts of each paragraph connect logically and
effectively. In all but a few cases, the paragraph’s point is expressed in
a clear topic sentence.

2.0 pts
Fairly Competent
Organization of the paper as a
whole can only be discerned with effort. (and/or…) Not all parts of the
paper fit the organizational structure. (and/or…) Not all the parts of the
paper are effectively integrated. In a number of paragraphs, there is not a
distinct or coherent point. (and/or) Topic sentences are missing or unclear
in a number of paragraphs. (and/or) In a number of paragraphs, the parts do
not connect logically.

1.75 pts
Not Yet Competent
Organization of the paper as a
whole is not logical or discernable.

2.5 pts

Total Points: 10.0

PreviousNext
The post Briefly take into account the data analyzed and needs identified in PS6150 and state your proposed intervention ideas .
Assignment status: Solved by our experts

>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *