You should write a paper that defends your conclusion regarding one of the following four topics for “Paper 2”:
(1) Is price gouging ever ethically permissible? If not, why not? If so, under what conditions?
(2) Can corporations be obligated to limit their negative environmental impact more than the law requires? Why or why not?
(3) Are there forms of deception that are morally permissible in business negotiations? If not, explain why. If so, what are they, and under what conditions are they permissible?
(4) Do common forms of advertising undermine autonomy in morally problematic ways? Why or why not?
In developing your paper, you should delve deep and engage the arguments that are presented in class readings. You should defend a specific ethical conclusion and offer three to five (more than five is probably not effective for the length of this paper) crisp, clear, well-reasoned arguments in support of it, explicitly drawing from the theoretical fraemworks discussed in class readings. You should write the paper in a way that makes it clear what your premises are, and that gives your reader strong reasons for accepting them. It may be helpful to present and assess the strongest objection you can think of to your view. The best papers will also have something interesting or somewhat original to say.
Here are other requirements for this paper:
-2500 words with a tolerance of 50 words deviance. That is, the acceptable upper limit for this paper is 2550 words and the acceptable lower limit is 2450 words. Otherwise, one fourth of the points will be deducted for each 50 words deviation.
-Times New Roman 12-point, double spaced, APA or MLA citation style
-Word document with the word count shown on the upper right corner of page 1
The post Writer’s choice from one of the four topics (see paper requirement)
Assignment status: Solved by our experts