[Solution]Real Estate Funding and Finance

Academic Irregularities – WARNING: This is an individual piece of work and students are reminded of the University’s regulations on academic irregularities, which covers plagiarism,…

Academic
Irregularities – WARNING:

This is an individual piece of work
and students are reminded of the University’s regulations on academic
irregularities, which covers plagiarism, copying, cheating and other
activities/situations/circumstances that may also constitute an academic
irregularity. You are expected to have read and checked that your
work does not contravene the University regulations on academic irregularities.
Examples on what constitutes an academic irregularity can be found in Section
17b of the Academic Standards and Quality Handbook which you are advised to
study carefully; it can be viewed and downloaded from the university intranet
at:

Introduction

This coursework is intended to help you meet and assess your achievement
of the module learning outcomes, identified below. The grade awarded will contribute
to your grade for this module and your overall level and course aggregate grade.
The assessment criteria are clearly set out within the coursework brief and it
is in your own interests to ensure that your work addresses the assessment
criteria clearly and in an appropriate manner and logical sequence. If you are
unsure or unclear about any aspect of what is required of you, you should
contact the coursework author or module leader straight away.

Submission Instructions

Your coursework must be submitted in two
formats – hard (paper) copy and an electronic copy in Microsoft Word format;
the content of both submissions must be identical. Submission of
different hardcopy and electronic versions of your work may be deemed an academic
irregularity under the University’s Academic Irregularities procedure. The electronic ‘Microsoft Word’ version of your
coursework must be submitted to the Module Drop Box which is located in
the module learning room on NOW; it should be uploaded no later than the
coursework submission date given above. The coursework will automatically be
assessed by the web-based text-match tool, Turnitin UK. Only one, final version of your work may be submitted to
the Drop Box. Once submitted you cannot revise your submission; you have only
one opportunity to submit.  Failure to submit your work to the Drop box by the submission deadline
will delay assessment of your work and may result in your work being deemed a
late submission and thereby subject to late submission assessment penalty.Please be aware that the hard copy paper version of
your coursework must be submitted by the submission deadline given above.
Submission of the hard copy of your work after this deadline will be deemed a
late submission, regardless of whether the electronic version has been
submitted on time. The hard copy that you submit will be taken as the primary
and only version for grading purposes, so you should ensure that this is
comprehensive and contains all the material that you wish to submit for
assessment; there will be no opportunity to add to the hard copy of your work
once submitted.

Presentation
Requirements

The coursework must
be typed; 12 point Arial font must
be used throughout for the main body of the work.Line spacing must
be 1.5 lines.Top, bottom, left and right margins must be at least 30mm.The coursework must
be presented ‘single side’ typed (not double sided).The core pages of the submission must be paginated.The coursework must not
extend beyond the word limit specified above.  Any work after this word limit has been
reached will not be graded.  The word
limit includes tables, figures and footnotes but excludes the bibliography
and/or list of references unless specifically directed otherwise by the module
leader. Make sure you proof read and spell check your work.  Remember that spell checkers will not
identify an incorrect but correctly spelt word.The coursework submission must be either treasury tagged or stapled using a single staple in
the top left hand corner. It must not
be spiral bound, placed in a file, folder or plastic wallet, or bound in any
other form.

Coursework Task and Additional
Guidance

This
assignment is worth 70% of the marks towards the total assessment for this
module.
 
Question
Critically
assess the extent to which changes in financial regulation could impact real
estate investment returns.
 
Research Approach
The approach
will be a study of secondary data sources (market reports, professional and
academic journals, government reports and national  statistics). Your findings should include
analysis of recent changes in financial regulation and discussion on
liquidity reform.
Output
Your report
should contain an executive summary and should be no more than 3000 words.
You are asked to justify and structure your answer by making use of fully
referenced supporting material
 
 

The following
assessment criteria will apply to this coursework. You should ensure that the
work that you submit appropriately addresses and corresponds with these criteria.

Assessment Criteria

Further Guidance

1.Changes in lending
conditions

Basel III: tier
1/tier 2 capital, CAP and Cook ratios.

2.Capital structure
of real estate companies

Liquidity coverage
ratio and Net Stable Funding Ratio

3.Cost of debt

CAPM: Borrowing
levels and borrowing costs

Grading of
assessed work: Assessment
of work submitted will be in accordance with both University general grading
descriptors for taught Masters courses (Level 7 NQF) – see below.

Assessment and Module
Learning Outcomes (MLOs)

The table below gives
details of the module learning outcomes (see Module Specification for full
details) that will be assessed by this coursework.

 
Module
Learning Outcomes (MLO) Assessed

Knowledge
and Understanding (delete as appropriate):
 
1,
2, 3
 

Skills
Qualities and Attributes (delete as appropriate):
 
1,
2, 3, 4, 5
 

General grading descriptors –Taught Masters (Level 7 NQF)

See table below.

Class

Scale

General Characteristics

DISTINCTION
(Excellent)

Exceptional
Dist.
93-100%

Exceptional breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding evidenced
by own independent insight and critical awareness of relevant literature and
concepts at the forefront of the discipline; evidence of extensive and
appropriate independent inquiry operating with advanced concepts, methods and
techniques to solve problems in unfamiliar contexts; Cogent arguments and
explanations are consistently provided using a range of media demonstrating
an ability to communicate effectively in a variety of formats using a
sophisticated level of the English language in an eloquent and professional
manner to both technical and non-technical audiences; a sustained academic
approach to all aspects of the tasks is evidenced; academic work extends
boundaries of the disciplines and is beyond expectation of the level and may achieve or be very close to publishable or commercial standard.

High Dist.
85-92%

Excellent knowledge and understanding evidenced by some clear independent insight and critical awareness of
relevant concepts some of which are at the forefront of the discipline;
evidence of appropriate independent inquiry operating with core concepts,
methods and techniques to solve complex problems in mostly familiar contexts;
Arguments and explanations are provided that is well-supported by the
literature and in some cases uses a range of media demonstrating an ability
to communicate effectively in a limited number of formats using own style
that is suited to both technical and non-technical audiences; a sustained
academic approach to most aspects of the tasks is evidenced; one or more aspects of the academic work
is beyond the prescribed range and evidences a competent understanding of
all of the relevant taught content.

Mid Dist.
78-84%

Dist.
70-77%

COMMENDATN
(Very good)

High Comm.
67-69%

Very good knowledge and understanding is evidenced as the student is typically able to independently relate
taught facts/concepts together some of which are at the forefront of the
discipline; evidence of some competent independent inquiry operating with
core concepts, methods and techniques to solve familiar problems; Arguments
and explanations are provided that are typically supported by the literature
and in some cases may challenge some received wisdoms; competently uses all taught
media and communication methods to communicate effectively in a familiar
settings; an academically rigorous approach applied to some aspects of the
tasks is evidenced; some beyond the prescribed range, may rely on set sources
to advance work/direct arguments; demonstrates autonomy in approach to
learning.

Mid Comm.
64-66%

Comm.
60-63%

PASS
(Good)

High Pass
57-59%

Good knowledge and understanding of the area of study balanced towards the descriptive rather
than critical or analytical and mostly confined to concepts that are not at
the forefront of the discipline; evidence of some independent reading and
research to advance work and inform arguments and approaches; Arguments and
explanations are limited in range and depth although some are adequately
supported by the literature albeit descriptively rather than critically;
competently uses at least one taught media and communication method to
communicate appropriately in familiar settings; although the approach applied
to some aspects of the tasks may lack academic rigour, there are some clear
areas of competence within the prescribed range. Relies on set sources to
advance work/direct arguments and communicated in a way which shows clarity
but structure may not always be coherent.

Mid Pass
54-56%

Pass
50-53%

FAIL
(Insufficient)

Marginal fail
45-49%

Knowledge and understanding
is marginally insufficient as the student is typically only able to deal with
terminology, basic facts and concepts; Adequate knowledge of concepts within the prescribed range but fails
to add meaningful detail or make sufficient links between concepts and facts
to adequately solve problems posed by the assessment; some ability to
independently select and evaluate reading/research however there is a strong
reliance on set sources and to provide descriptive and unsubstantiated
arguments/methods; communication/presentation is competent in places and at a
threshold level as it fails to demonstrate clarity and focus; inability to adequately define problems and make
reasoned judgements; The general approach to tasks lacks rigor and where
there is competence and rigor, it is not sustained.

Mid fail
40-44%

Knowledge and understanding is insufficient as
the student only evidences an understanding of small subset of the taught concepts
and techniques; fails to
make sufficient links between known concepts and facts to adequately solve
relevant aspects of the brief/problem; little ability to independently select
and evaluate reading/research with almost total reliance on set sources and
unsubstantiated arguments/methods; communication/presentation may be
competent in places but fails to demonstrate structure, clarity and/or focus; inability to adequately define problems and make
reasoned judgements; The general approach to tasks lacks rigor and
competence.

Low fail
1-39%

Knowledge and understanding is highly
insufficient as the student is unable to evidence any meaningful
understanding of two or more taught concepts or methods; very limited evidence of reading and research
to advance work; inadequate technical and practical skills as the student is
unable to use and apply such skills to address problems or make judgements;
limited or lack of understanding of the boundaries of the discipline and does
not question received wisdom; approach to learning lacks autonomy and
approach to tasks is not sustained; inability to communicate coherently.

ZERO

Work of no merit
OR absent, work not submitted, penalty in some misconduct cases.

Assignment status: Solved by our experts

>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *