[Solution]Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Assessment Task 2: Health Literacy Assessment Report

Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Assessment Task 2: Health Literacy Assessment Report o The report must be 1500 words. o Word count does not include…

Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Assessment Task 2: Health Literacy Assessment Report o The report must be 1500 words. o Word count does not include cover page, reference list, and tables or figures (if any). o Penalties may be applied for exceeding the word limit – words significantly beyond the limit will not receive marks. The submission must be in APA style. o The Assignment is worth 35% of your final mark. o Late Penalty: 10% per day. Submissions more than 5 days late will receive zero marks Aims and Background The aim of this assignment is to develop skills so students are able to assess the health literacy of health promotion and disease prevention campaigns. To complete this assignment you will complete a research report assessing the health literacy of two health-related, written information brochures (as per the instructions below). This assignment relates to the Unit Learning Objectives of:  Explain key concepts related to health, well-being, disease, health promotion and disease prevention.  Choose appropriate health promotion or disease prevention strategies to address determinants of health, based on evidence and ethical principles.  Critically evaluate health promotion and disease prevention interventions. Instructions You will write a report that addresses the following topic: Write a 1500-word report based on an assessment of the health literacy of two health-related, written information brochures. Your report must be structured as follows:  Introduction – explain topic, provide background literature relevant to the report and outline aim.  Method – describe procedures taken to assess brochures. Provide sufficient detail/instruction to repeat the assessment.  Results/findings – describe the results (quantitative/qualitative) of the brochures. You can use tables and figures to support your findings.  Discussion – compare and contrast the brochures, focusing on similarities/differences, connect the findings to previous literature.  Conclusion – outline the main findings identified in your report. Make recommendations about the appropriateness of the brochures References Appendices (optional) To gather information and prepare for your report, please complete the following steps. Step 1: Read health literacy literature. Make notes of points to use in your report Step 2: Choose a topic from the list on Canvas Step 3: Read the two brochures provided for the topic (see Canvas). Assess each brochure separately using a mixed method (quantitative/ qualitative) approach. Quantitative assessment: o Use the SMOG formula (see instructions on Canvas) to assess the reading level of each brochure. Qualitative assessment: Use the following questions to generate themes to present in your report o How appropriate is the design and information for the target population? (consider age, gender, cultural background etc) o What are the strengths of the brochures? o What are the limitations of the brochures? Step 3: Compare and contrast the two brochures based on your findings. Aspects to consider: o How are the brochures similar? o How are the brochures different? o How do your findings relate to previous literature? Do they support/refute and/or add new information to existing literature? o What are the conclusions based on your findings? o Recommendations: Which brochure is more effective in promoting health/preventing disease for the target population and why? How can the brochures be improved? Step 4: Write up report NOTE: Further explanation will be provided in tutorials Marking criteria Criteria & Expectations Fail Pass (50-59%) Credit (60-69%) Distinction (70- 79%) High Distinction (80%+) Introduction (0/10) Introduction is brief or missing. Introduction briefly describes the topic and aim of the report. Includes some relevant background literature. Introduction describes the topic and aim of the report. Includes relevant background literature but needs to be more concise. Introduction describes the topic and aim of the report. Includes background literature that is mostly concise. Introduction clearly describes the topic and aim of the report. Background literature provided is relevant, engaging and concise. Method (0/10) Methods used to assess the brochure are incomplete, incorrect, or missing. Qualitative and quantitative methods used to assess the brochure are described, but lacking in detail. Qualitative and quantitative methods used to assess the brochure are described, but lacking in some detail. Qualitative and quantitative methods used to assess the brochure are described, and are mostly detailed. Clearly describes the qualitative and quantitative methods used to assess the brochure. Provides sufficient detail to repeat the assessment. Results/findin gs (0/10) Results and findings are incorrect or missing. Reports quantitative results and qualitative findings, however some information is inaccurate or unclear. Reports quantitative results and qualitative findings, some information unclear. Reports quantitative results and qualitative findings, information mostly clear. Quantitative results are accurate and qualitative findings are summarised into themes. Information presented is easy to read. Discussion (0/10) Discussion does not demonstrate an understanding of Discussion demonstrates a basic understanding Discussion demonstrates a fairly good Discussion demonstrates a good understanding Discussion demonstrates a thorough understanding the findings comparing and contrasting the similarities/differenc es of the brochures in regards to health literacy. No links made to previous literature. of the findings comparing and contrasting the similarities/differenc es of the brochures in regards to health literacy. Minimal links made to previous literature. understanding of the findings comparing and contrasting the similarities/differenc es of the brochures in regards to health literacy. Some links made to previous literature. of the findings comparing and contrasting the similarities/differenc es of the brochures in regards to health literacy. Good links made to previous literature. of the findings comparing and contrasting the similarities/differences of the brochures in regards to health literacy. Strong links made to previous literature. Conclusion (0/10) Conclusion is brief or missing. Concludes based on main findings however the rationale for suggested recommendations is not clearly linked to assessment. Concludes based on main findings however the rationale for suggested recommendations is somewhat linked to assessment. Concludes based on main findings however the rationale for suggested recommendations is linked to assessment. Effectively summarises and concludes main findings and provides thoughtful recommendations about the brochures. Communicatio n, organisation, and grammar Difficult to read; Hard to follow ideas and lacks direction; Extensive grammatical issues; over 2-page limit Communicates ideas however language is not appropriate or too wordy. Simple organisation evident. Moderate grammatical issues Communicates ideas using appropriate language; some unnecessary repetition of ideas. Minor grammatical errors throughout document Effectively communicates ideas using appropriate language and logical structure. Rare grammatical errors throughout document Effectively communicates ideas using appropriate and concise language, and a clear and logical structure. Free of grammatical/typographi cal errors. Referencing Lacking necessary references Numerous statements missing Many statements have appropriate Most statements have appropriate All statements have appropriate reference; throughout; In-text citations and reference list are missing or formatted incorrectly. No consistency between references in document and reference list; References used are inappropriate or not credible. references; Numerous formatting issues of in-text citations and reference list; Major inconsistencies between references in document and reference list; Uses recommended or personally-sourced references. reference; Some issues with formatting of in-text citations and reference list; minor inconsistencies between references in document and reference list; Uses recommended and personally-sourced references. reference; Minor issues with formatting of in-text citations and reference list; Pretty consistent between references in document and reference list; Uses recommended and credible, personallysourced references. In-text citations and reference list formatted correctly using APA 6th style; Complete consistency between references in document and ref list; Uses recommended and credible, personallysourced references.

Assignment status: Solved by our experts

>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *