[Solution]Reflective essay Your reflective essay should address the following points:

Reflective essay Your reflective essay should address the following points: How did you evaluate your records to assess their quality? How did you use the…

Reflective essay

Your reflective essay should address the following points:

How did you evaluate your records to assess
their quality?How did you use the principles of precision
and recall to evaluate your use of elements and data values?How did you use feedback on your records to
improve the quality of each record?

 Marking criteria:

Word length (maximum): 2,000 wordsWritten work is clear, well organized and
includes appropriate references.The submitted work answers the questions
posed in the assignment prompt.

These are the three codes:

Dublin CoreVRA CoreEAD

following are the feedbacks given by my teacher of the three
assignments.

Dublin
Core

These are the
requirements then:

feedback
from teacher:

Areas
of strength  

 You made a consistent effort to use element
encoding schemes to enhance the granularity and precision of your DC record.

Areas
of improvement  

There
is one instance where your xml is not valid

VRA Core

These are the
requirements then:

Areas of strength  

 You
selected appropriate data values throughout your record and you made a clear
effort to create granular metadata that a wide range of users could understand.

Feedback
from teacher:

Areas of improvement  

Your description set
does not structure the information you included in your <display>
element.

Remember, display and
indexing information perform particular functions in a relational database.

Remember you need to
create two image records. One for a general view of the work and one detail of
the work. 

EAD

These are the
requirements then:

Feedback
from teacher:

Areas of strength  

Your <eadheader>
is granular and accurate, you made excellent use of EAD elements and attributes
to structure information about the finding aid.

Overall your
<dsc> is logical and complete, you make a good effort to distinguish
between series, subseries and items. One suggestion: when you change from
<c03> to <c04> explore options for your level attribute.

Areas of improvement  

You did not include the
DTD information in your finding aid. This information is incredibly important
because it ensures I can check your XML against a schema specification.

Your
<controlaccess> is, overall, well structured and you distinguish between
subjects, personal names. You’ll want to consider your use of <geogname>
though, that implies geographic information will be encoded, not a subject.

Assignment status: Solved by our experts

>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *