[Solution]Conflicting Viewpoints – Should Students Have to Wear School Uniforms?

The Pro:  School uniforms make getting ready for school easier, which can improve punctuality.  Wearing uniforms enhances school pride, unity, and community spirit.…

The Pro:
 School uniforms make getting ready for school easier, which can improve punctuality.
 Wearing uniforms enhances school pride, unity, and community spirit.
 School uniforms keep students focused on their education, not their clothes.
The Con:
 The push for school uniforms is driven by commercial interests rather than educational ones.
 School uniforms in public schools undermine the promise of a free education by imposing an extra expense on families.
 Focusing on uniforms takes attention away from finding genuine solutions to problems in education.

Assignment 1.3: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part III

Synthesizing and Writing
Due Week 9 and worth 150 points

The assignment is divided into three (3) parts.
For Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.

Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the Webtext.

In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you identified, presented and evaluated two arguments, one supporting your own view, and one supporting the view that you don’t agree with.

Part III – Synthesizing and Writing
Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.
Identify the strongest argument that supports your position in the debate. Present the argument and evaluate it (do it in an essay form, and so, differently than what you did in Assignment 1.2). Do the same for the strongest argument supporting your opponent’s view. Which argument is stronger and how can we assess that?
Explain your answers to the “believing game” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.
Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.
Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.

Remember to do research and only use high-quality sources in this paper. ProCon.org was appropriate for the pre-writing stage, but not for the actual research paper.

The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:

Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow SWS format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.
Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.

Points: 150

Assignment 1.3: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part III

Criteria

Unacceptable
Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D

Fair
70-79% C

Proficient
80-89% B

Exemplary
90-100% A

1.State your position on the topic.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely stated your position on the topic.

Insufficiently stated your position on the topic.

Partially stated your position on the topic.

Satisfactorily stated your position on the topic.

Thoroughly stated your position on the topic.

Present and evaluate the strongest arguments in support of your position and the position of your opponent. Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely presented and/or evaluated the strongest arguments in support of your position and the position of your opponent.

Insufficiently presented and/or evaluated the strongest arguments in support of your position and the position of your opponent.

Partially presented and/or evaluated the strongest arguments in support of your position and the position of your opponent.

Satisfactorily presented and/or evaluated the strongest arguments in support of your position and the position of your opponent.

Thoroughly presented and/or evaluated the strongest arguments in support of your position and the position of your opponent.

Explain your answers to the “believing game” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely explained your answers to the “believing game” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.

Insufficiently explained your answers to the “believing game” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.

Partially explained your answers to the “believing game” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.

Satisfactorily explained your answers to the “believing game” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.

Thoroughly explained your answers to the “believing game” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.

Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely examined at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

Insufficiently examined at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

Partially examined at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

Satisfactorily examined at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

Thoroughly examined at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

Insufficiently discussed the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

Partially discussed the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

Satisfactorily discussed the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

Thoroughly discussed the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.
Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue stayed the same.

Insufficiently discussed whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue stayed the same.

Partially discussed whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue stayed the same.

Satisfactorily discussed whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue stayed the same.

Thoroughly discussed whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue stayed the same.

Follow SWS requirements for format, in-text citation of quotes and paraphrases, and references page.
Weight: 10%

Did not complete the assignment or had more than 9 errors in following SWS requirements.

Had 8-9 errors in following SWS requirements.

Had 6-7 different errors in following SWS requirements.

Had 4-5 different errors in following SWS requirements.

Had 0-3 different errors in following SWS requirements.

Follow guidelines for clear and organized writing: include an introductory and concluding paragraph; address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely followed guidelines for clear and organized writing.

Insufficiently followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: did not include an introductory and / or concluding paragraph; did not address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.

Partially followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: included a partially developed introductory and / or concluding paragraph; partially addressed main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.

Sufficiently followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: included an introductory and concluding paragraph; sufficiently addressed main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.

Thoroughly followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: included an engaging introductory and thoughtful concluding paragraph; thoroughly addressed main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and detailed supporting sentences.

Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
Weight: 10%

Did not complete the assignment or had more than 9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 8-9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 6-7 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 4-5 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 0-3 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.
The post Conflicting Viewpoints – Should Students Have to Wear School Uniforms?

Assignment status: Solved by our experts

>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *