[Recommended]Final Exam Essay, DUE AT THE START OF CLASS (or before) on 9/5:

Final Exam Essay, DUE AT THE START OF CLASS (or before) on 9/5: Book Review: Assigned Readings: There are two assigned books for the course,…

Final Exam Essay, DUE AT THE START OF CLASS (or before) on 9/5:
Book Review:
Assigned Readings: There are two assigned books for the course, United States: A Brief Narrative History, which serves as the central reader and Redskins?: Sport Mascots, Indian Nations and White Racism (New Critical Viewpoints on Society
Series), from which students will compose a scholarly book review. Both are available at the Coyote Bookstore. Students should complete the reading assignments prior to their corresponding class meetings.
BOOK REVIEW: There is a typed, 12 font, double-spaced, minimum of 5 pages – 1250 words, scholarly, 3rd person book review of Redskins?, utilizing the following form: 1. A brief summary of the book. 2. Discuss and analyze the content of each chapter in the order that they appear in the book.
3. The student’s overall analysis of the significance of the ideas discussed in the book. ** Outside sources are welcome, though not required for the achievement of any grade for the assignment; all essays must follow APA, MLA or Chicago/Turabian style. ** Proper citations are required. NO QUOTES are
allowed; the book review should only be in the student’s own words!
The following grading standards will be implemented for the book review:
A (90-100%): Superb – The book review contains distinctive points that describes in focused detail, each point of evidence and the essay demonstrates insightful analysis and a clearly defined purpose. Structure and content present a clear sense of beginning, middle, and end. Distinctive, appropriate transitions connect paragraphs to each other and to the thesis, creating unity and direction. There are no historical errors. The intellectual arguments are most original and highly nuanced. The book review demonstrates a masterful understanding of material and the word choice and level of formality is superb. It also defines unusual terms and provides necessary background when applicable. Appropriate evidence and insightful explanation appear often. Sources are cited expertly, using the appropriate style. Mechanics such as grammar, spelling, and punctuation are flawless. Considerable proof-reading has taken place. Sentence variety emphasizes ideas and demonstrates exceptional effort and or superb writing skills, and thus the essay is a marvelous literary effort. The book review responds to each requirement set for by the professor, and as outlined in the syllabus, without exception. The book review is typed clearly on clean white paper, all pages are properly bound, and the cover-page includes the name of the student, the course, the title of the book and its author, and the name of the instructor, creating a professional appearance. The book review exceeds the page minimum.
B (80-89%) Very good – The content of the book review is well-organized and cogent and consists of sound interpretation, opinion, or purpose, but it lacks the depth or detail of an “A” book review. Structure and content present a clear sense of beginning, middle and end. There are no historical errors. The intellectual arguments are original and generally well-nuanced. Transitions generally connect paragraphs, although some may be simple or generic, showing an imperfect sense of unity and direction. Sound evidence and explanation appear in most paragraphs, although they may be less
appropriate, or require more detail or elaboration. Sources are all cited appropriately. Mechanics such as grammar, spelling, and punctuation are practically flawless, and if errors occur, they do not confound the denotation. Some sentence variety demonstrates that an attempt at crafting the work has taken place and an effort or that the writer has fine writing skills. The book review responds to each requirement set for by the professor, and as outlined in the syllabus, without exception. The book review is typed clearly on clean white paper, all pages are properly bound, and the cover-page includes the name of the student, the course, the title of the book and its author, and the name of the instructor, creating a professional appearance. The book review meets or exceeds the page minimum.
C (70-79%) Acceptable College Level Work – The book review responds to each component of the assignment, but it may be too general and does not necessarily prove each contention with supporting evidence and may be based on assumptions, or be commonly accepted fact unconnected to purpose. There is no more than one historical error. The intellectual arguments are slightly original, though not highly nuanced. Structure and content present an imperfect sense of beginning, middle, and end. Some transitions occur, but they may be awkward or generic, giving the essay little sense of unity or direction. The book review demonstrates a superficial understanding of the material, and in parts it resembles an unrevised draft. Problems occur in word choice and formality, and in defining terms. Evidence and explanation appear in some paragraphs, but the evidence may be general or the explanation assumptive. Sources are cited, though not with flawless consistently. The book review meets the page minimum. Mechanics such as grammar, spelling, and punctuation contain regular, patterned errors, suggesting poor proofreading or underdeveloped writing skills. The book review is inconsistently presented, and includes more than one typographical or printing error. The book review responds to each requirement set for by the professor, and as outlined in the syllabus, without exception. The book review is typed clearly on clean white paper, all pages are properly bound, and the cover-page includes the name of the student, the course, the title of the book and its author, and the name of the instructor, creating a professional appearance.
D (60-69%) Less Than Satisfactory College Level Work – The content of this book review is quite superficial and it is clearly based on improvable assumptions and or obvious facts, thus demonstrating that little thought or effort was put into research and the subsequent writing. Structure and content present an incoherent sense of beginning, middle, and end. Transitions, if they occur, are confusing or generic. The book review reads like an unrevised draft. Problems occur in word choice and formality, and in defining terms. There are no more than two historical errors. The intellectual arguments are disjointed and the evidence that is used does not support the assertions. Inappropriate sources or questionable or unrelated evidence is utilized. All of the components of the assignment have not been addressed. Sources are not always cited. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation contain regular errors, confusing meaning and suggesting poor proofreading and underdeveloped writing skills. The book review is unprofessionally presented, and includes many typographical or printing errors. The book review is typed clearly on clean white paper, all pages are properly bound, and the
cover-page includes the name of the student, the course, the title of the book and its author, and the name of the instructor, creating a professional appearance. The book review does not meet the page minimum.
F (below 60%) Does Not Meet The Minimum Requirements – The themes are not developed and at times significant components that should be addressed are nonexistent or incoherent. Structure and content present an incoherent sense of beginning, middle, and end. Transitions, if they occur, are confusing or incoherent. The writing shows below a college level understanding of the material and reads like a very rough draft. There are more than two historical errors. There is no genuine intellectual argument offered at any point. Serious problems occur in word choice and formality, and in defining terms. Evidence and explanation do not appear in an appropriate manner or they are random and unrelated. Sources are not cited properly. Mechanics such as grammar, spelling, and punctuation render the paper incoherent, suggesting poor proofreading and undeveloped writing skills. The book review is unprofessionally presented, and includes many typographical or printing errors. The book review is typed clearly on clean white paper, all pages are properly bound, and the cover-page includes the name of the student, the course, the title of the book and its author, and the name of the instructor, creating a professional appearance. The book review does not meet the page minimum.
Final Exam Essay, DUE AT THE START OF CLASS (or before) on 9/5:
Write a 5 page, typed, 12 font, double-spaced, all in your own words, no quotes, essay that discusses the greater American Historical Experience from the Reconstruction Era to the Recent Past, with your framework of analysis being:
· Westward Expansion
· Progressive Era

The post Final Exam Essay, DUE AT THE START OF CLASS (or before) on 9/5: appeared first on ExpertCustomWritings.
Assignment status: Solved by our experts

>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *