[Solution]Nursing: EBP project

Purpose This assignment culminates the evidence-based practice change proposal using the provided Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Template. Added components to the EBP change proposal include…

Purpose This assignment culminates the evidence-based practice change proposal using the provided Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Template. Added components to the EBP change proposal include identification of key stakeholders, data collection and analysis methods, and expected outcomes related to the chosen nursing practice change and PICOT question. Click the following link for a printable version of the instructions: NR505 Week 7 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Assignment (Links to an external site.) Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO #1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO # 1) CO #2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare outcomes. (PO #2, 5) CO #4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 3, 5) CO #5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5) Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week Seven Total Points: 150 points Requirements Description of the Assignment For this assignment, the student will complete the Evidence-Based Practice Change Project Proposal Template (Links to an external site.). The areas within the template include identification of the nursing practice issue/problem, PICOT question, theoretical framework, literature review, key stakeholders, data collection methods, analysis and expected outcomes. Criteria for Content Complete the following sections within the Evidence-Based Practice Change Project Proposal Template: Nursing Practice issue/problem – describe the area of interest and practice issue/problem within your nursing specialty area. Identify your MSN Specialty Track. PICOT question – Restate your PICOT question. Key stakeholders – identify the key stakeholders involved in your practice change project. Theoretical framework – describe the theoretical framework guiding your practice change project. Literature review – Summarize the literature review from the Research Summary Table completed in week 5. Data collection methods – Describe the data collection methods for your practice change project Data analysis – Describe how you will analyze the data collected. Expected Outcomes – What are the expected outcomes from this practice change project? Preparing the Assignment Criteria for Format and Special Instructions Completion of the Evidence-Based Practice Change Project Proposal Template. Title page and reference page added to the template. Scholarly literature is used – citations and references. APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual is followed. Directions and Assignment Criteria Assignment Criteria Points % Description Practice Problem PICOT Stakeholders 40 Complete the Practice Problem, PICOT and Stakeholder Sections of the Evidence-Based Practice Change Project Proposal Template addressing the following: Describe area of interest and practice problem. Identify your MSN Specialty Track Discuss problem background Identify key stakeholders involved in your problem/practice change Restate the PICO formatted clinical/practice question Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented. Theoretical Framework Literature Review 50 Complete the Theoretical Framework and Literature Review Sections of the Evidence-Based Practice Change Project Proposal Template addressing the following: Describe the theoretical framework guiding your practice change project. Summarize key ideas, facts, and/or themes from literature that support a change in practice using the research summary table completed in Week 5 Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented Data Collection Methods Analysis Expected Outcomes 40 Complete the Data Collection Methods, Analysis and Expected Outcomes Sections of the Evidence-Based Practice Change Project Proposal Template addressing the following: Describe the data collections methods for your practice change project. Describe how you will analyze data collected. What are the expected outcomes from this practice change project? Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support Graduate-Level Writing Style 20 Distinguished graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria: Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) Correct APA format for the following: Font style and size Margins and spacing Title page and reference page added to the template Citation and referencing sources Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) Total 150 100 % Rubric Week 7: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Assignment (SEPT19) Week 7: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Assignment (SEPT19) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Problem/PICOT/Stakeholders 40.0 pts Exceptional Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Describe area of interest and practice problem. • Identify your MSN Specialty Track • Discuss problem background • Identify key stakeholders involved in your problem/practice change • Restate the PICO formatted clinical/practice question • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 35.0 pts Exceeds Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Describe area of interest and practice problem. • Identify your MSN Specialty Track • Discuss problem background • Identify key stakeholders involved in your problem/practice change • Restate the PICO formatted clinical/practice question • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 32.0 pts Meets Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Describe area of interest and practice problem. • Identify your MSN Specialty Track • Discuss problem background • Identify key stakeholders involved in your problem/practice change • Restate the PICO formatted clinical/practice question • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 15.0 pts Needs Improvement Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Describe area of interest and practice problem. • Identify your MSN Specialty Track • Discuss problem background • Identify key stakeholders involved in your problem/practice change • Restate the PICO formatted clinical/practice question • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 0.0 pts Developing Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: • Describe area of interest and practice problem. • Identify your MSN Specialty Track • Discuss problem background • Identify key stakeholders involved in your problem/practice change • Restate the PICO formatted clinical/practice question • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Framework and Literature Review 50.0 pts Exceptional Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Describe the theoretical framework guiding your practice change project. • Summarize key ideas, facts, and/or themes from literature that support a change in practice using the research summary table completed in Week 5 • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 44.0 pts Exceeds Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Describe the theoretical framework guiding your practice change project. • Summarize key ideas, facts, and/or themes from literature that support a change in practice using the research summary table completed in Week 5 • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 40.0 pts Meets Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Describe the theoretical framework guiding your practice change project. • Summarize key ideas, facts, and/or themes from literature that support a change in practice using the research summary table completed in Week 5 • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 19.0 pts Needs Improvement Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Describe the theoretical framework guiding your practice change project. • Summarize key ideas, facts, and/or themes from literature that support a change in practice using the research summary table completed in Week 5 • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 0.0 pts Developing Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: • Describe the theoretical framework guiding your practice change project. • Summarize key ideas, facts, and/or themes from literature that support a change in practice using the research summary table completed in Week 5 • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 50.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Methods, Analysis, and Expected Outcomes 40.0 pts Exceptional Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Describe the data collections methods for your practice change project. • Describe how you will analyze data collected. • What are the expected outcomes from this practice change project? • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 35.0 pts Exceeds Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Describe the data collections methods for your practice change project. • Describe how you will analyze data collected. • What are the expected outcomes from this practice change project? • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented. 32.0 pts Meets Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements • Describe the data collections methods for your practice change project. • Describe how you will analyze data collected. • What are the expected outcomes from this practice change project? • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 15.0 pts Needs Improvement Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Describe the data collections methods for your practice change project. • Describe how you will analyze data collected. • What are the expected outcomes from this practice change project? • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 0.0 pts Developing Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: • Describe the data collections methods for your practice change project. • Describe how you will analyze data collected. • What are the expected outcomes from this practice change project? • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraduate-Level Writing Style 20.0 pts Exceptional Distinguished graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following: o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Title page and reference page added to the template o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) 18.0 pts Exceeds Graduate-level writing style exceeds expectations as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 2-4 errors total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following: o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Title page and reference page added to the template o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) 16.0 pts Meets Graduate-level writing style is competent as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 5-7 errors, total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following: o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Title page and reference page added to the template o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) 8.0 pts Needs Improvement Graduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 8-9 errors, total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following: o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Title page and reference page added to the template o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) 0.0 pts Developing Graduate-level writing style is unsatisfactory as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 10 or more errors, total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following: o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Title page and reference page added to the template o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) 20.0

The post Nursing: EBP project

Assignment status: Solved by our experts

>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *