[Solution]Chosen Stem Career is Psychiatrist

Chosen stem career is psychiatrist. For this final case study, choose one contested development in the history of your profession or field of study and…

Chosen stem career is psychiatrist.
For this final case study, choose one contested development in the history of your profession or field of study and based on research and complete the worksheet. If you have already discussed your own profession in the class, choose an ethical debate related to a STEM profession that has not been covered.
For this case study, be sure to apply a detailed ethical system to the selected case. Consider at least 4 specific aspects of an ethical rationale for your discussion of whether the instance is moral and your discussion of leadership recommendations.
Be sure to use the worksheet and post as a MS Word document or PDF.
 
Name:
Case Study Title:
Briefly What happened? Provide a properly formatted MLA or APA reference for the article(s) used and a brief summary of the case. Be sure to give enough information that the reader does not need to guess why the person blew the whistle, what actions were seen as wrong.
 
 
Key Stakeholders and how were they negatively impacted: [This does not need to be a complete list, but you should include a minimum of four major stakeholders (not stockholders, though the stockholders may be stakeholders) unless it is clear there were less than four. Briefly explain the relationship with the company – why they are stakeholders]
 
 
What was the final outcome? [Provide details about prison, fines, termination, and for how many individuals. Report any other outcome you find interesting. Include documentation.]
 
 
Describe why you feel the actions were morally wrong? [Be sure to use keywords describing at least two moral theories from your compass (consequentialist, care, duty, act utilitarian, prima facie duties, etc.) that would allow you to classify the action as morally wrong. Alternatively, discuss why you may feel the action was morally acceptable. If your compass has only one theory, be sure to explain this as well.]
 
 
Put yourself in a position of leadership and describe what you would put in place that would have prevented this in the first place or keep it from happening again. Alternatively, what rules would you implement to justify the action:
 
 
 

Name:
 
Case Study Title
:
 
Briefly
What happened?
 
Provide a properly formatted MLA or APA reference for the
article(s) used and a brief summary of the case.
 
Be sure to give enough information that
the reader does not need to guess why the person blew the whistle, what actions were
seen as wrong.
 
 
 
Key Stakeholders and how were they negatively
 
impacted
:
[
This does not need to
be a complete list,
 
but you should
 
include a minimum of four
 
major stakeholders (not
stockholders, though the stockholders may be stakeholders)
 
unless it is clear there
were less than four.
 
 
Briefly explain the relationship with the company

 
why they are
stakeholders
]
 
 
 
What was the final
 
outcome?
 
[
Provide details about
prison, fines, termination, and for
how many individuals
. Report any other outcome you find interesting.
 
Include
documentation.
]
 
 
 
Describe why you feel the actions were morally wrong?
 
[Be sure to use keywords
describing
at
 
least two moral theories from your compass
 
(consequentialist, care, duty,
act utilitarian, prima facie duties,
etc.
)
that would allow you to classify
 
the action as
Name:
Case Study Title:
Briefly What happened? Provide a properly formatted MLA or APA reference for the
article(s) used and a brief summary of the case. Be sure to give enough information that
the reader does not need to guess why the person blew the whistle, what actions were
seen as wrong.
 
 
Key Stakeholders and how were they negatively impacted: [This does not need to
be a complete list, but you should include a minimum of four major stakeholders (not
stockholders, though the stockholders may be stakeholders) unless it is clear there
were less than four. Briefly explain the relationship with the company – why they are
stakeholders]
 
 
What was the final outcome? [Provide details about prison, fines, termination, and for
how many individuals. Report any other outcome you find interesting. Include
documentation.]
 
 
Describe why you feel the actions were morally wrong? [Be sure to use keywords
describing at least two moral theories from your compass (consequentialist, care, duty,
act utilitarian, prima facie duties, etc.) that would allow you to classify the action as

Assignment status: Solved by our experts

>>>Click here to get this paper written at the best price. 100% Custom, 0% plagiarism.<<<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *